I think the answer to both of the questions can be combined into one post because if there ARE clearly defined roles, then there is a BLACK versus a WHITE. However, if there are NO clear roles, then it starts to become a GREY matter.
I believe that clear, defined roles do not exist for ideas such as 'good' and 'evil'. Many people have stepped into either world and then come back to their starting place. For example: Hitler had planned on seeing his country become the most powerful country in the world through 'evil' actions. However, for some time, he had stepped into the 'good' side in order to advance his ultimate goal. In the end, however, Hitler and his actions were seen to be 'evil' by the whole world.
Similarly, and this happens in movies very often, a character starts out as being 'good', steps over the line a few times just to strive towards the ultimate triumph over their adversaries. In either case, there was no law that restricted a person from going outside the circle of 'good' or 'evil.
It again falls back on the topic of whether or not 'good' and 'evil' are subjected or not. What one person views as being 'evil' can be viewed as being 'good' by the person beside them. When differences like those run through 6 billion people, there is a VERY low chance that 'good' and 'evil' would have clear defined roles. It just seems unrealistic.
Sahil
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"I belive" "I think" are both very unnecessary. There needs to be specific evidence and referencing to texts to support the opinion.
ReplyDeleteGood points, but I think you should include more specific examples like Ms.C said:)
ReplyDelete